Lettings software: Letting Agent Software Pricing Index

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

10 of the 28 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 18 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 5 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 144 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): the published price per supplier normalised to a single comparable figure - cost per month for an agency of 50, 200 and 500 managed tenancies - across per-user, per-unit, banded and percentage-of-rent models, which is the work the buyer cannot do from the suppliers' own pages because no two publish in the same unit; the SHARE of the UK market that publishes any price at all, counted against the supplier roster rather than against the handful a comparison article happened to find; the cheapest published entry point by agency size; and whether each supplier states that it holds client money and in which scheme, taken from its own page, so price and client-money handling sit in one row

144 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.